[libc++][doc] Updates LWG3346 status. #80536
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The issue addresses an obvious wording issue. Implementing the constructors as specified in the synposis, as libc++ did, already implements the fixed behaviour. Updates: - LWG3346 pair and tuple copy and move constructor have backwards specification
llvmbot
added
the
libc++
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx Author: Mark de Wever (mordante) ChangesThe issue addresses an obvious wording issue. Implementing the constructors as specified in the synposis, as libc++ did, already implements the fixed behaviour. Updates:
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80536.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx20Issues.csv b/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx20Issues.csv
index 964c21df97e21..316127f44e0dd 100644
--- a/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx20Issues.csv
+++ b/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx20Issues.csv
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@
"`3335 <https://wg21.link/LWG3335>`__","Resolve C++20 NB comments US 273 and GB 274","Prague","|Complete|","15.0","|ranges|"
"`3338 <https://wg21.link/LWG3338>`__","Rename ``default_constructible``\ to ``default_initializable``\ ","Prague","|Complete|","13.0"
"`3340 <https://wg21.link/LWG3340>`__","Formatting functions should throw on argument/format string mismatch in |sect|\ [format.functions]","Prague","|Complete|","14.0","|format|"
-"`3346 <https://wg21.link/LWG3346>`__","``pair``\ and ``tuple``\ copy and move constructor have backwards specification","Prague","",""
+"`3346 <https://wg21.link/LWG3346>`__","``pair``\ and ``tuple``\ copy and move constructor have backwards specification","Prague","|Nothing To Do|",""
"`3347 <https://wg21.link/LWG3347>`__","``std::pair<T, U>``\ now requires ``T``\ and ``U``\ to be less-than-comparable","Prague","|Complete|","17.0"
"`3348 <https://wg21.link/LWG3348>`__","``__cpp_lib_unwrap_ref``\ in wrong header","Prague","|Complete|","12.0"
"`3349 <https://wg21.link/LWG3349>`__","Missing ``__cpp_lib_constexpr_complex``\ for P0415R1","Prague","|Complete|","16.0"
|
ldionne
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2024
agozillon
pushed a commit
to agozillon/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
The issue addresses an obvious wording issue. Implementing the constructors as specified in the synposis, as libc++ did, already implements the fixed behaviour. Updates: - LWG3346 pair and tuple copy and move constructor have backwards specification
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The issue addresses an obvious wording issue. Implementing the constructors as specified in the synposis, as libc++ did, already implements the fixed behaviour.
Updates: