-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
Fix R_AVR_7_PCREL and R_AVR_13_PCREL range checking #92695
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -82,13 +82,25 @@ sbic b, 1 ; R_AVR_PORT5 | |
; CHECK-NEXT: rjmp .-36 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: breq .+26 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: breq .-40 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: rjmp .-4096 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: rjmp .+4094 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: rjmp .+4094 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: rjmp .-4096 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: breq .-128 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: breq .+126 | ||
; HEX-LABEL: section .PCREL: | ||
; HEX-NEXT: 0fc0eecf 69f061f3 | ||
foo: | ||
rjmp foo + 32 ; R_AVR_13_PCREL | ||
rjmp foo - 32 ; R_AVR_13_PCREL | ||
breq foo + 32 ; R_AVR_7_PCREL | ||
breq foo - 32 ; R_AVR_7_PCREL | ||
rjmp 1f - 4096 $ 1: ; R_AVR_13_PCREL | ||
rjmp 1f + 4094 $ 1: ; R_AVR_13_PCREL | ||
rjmp 1f - 4098 $ 1: ; R_AVR_13_PCREL (overflow) | ||
rjmp 1f + 4096 $ 1: ; R_AVR_13_PCREL (overflow) | ||
breq 1f - 128 $ 1: ; R_AVR_7_PCREL | ||
breq 1f + 126 $ 1: ; R_AVR_7_PCREL | ||
Comment on lines
+98
to
+103
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. For those not familiar with this syntax, the rjmp 1f - 4096 $ 1: Is equivalent to the following: rjmp 1f - 4096
1: (where |
||
|
||
.section .LDSSTS,"ax",@progbits | ||
; CHECK-LABEL: section .LDSSTS: | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did not catch your point at here, indeed
RJMP
/RCALL
have a range limit of [-4096, 4094], why we can not check it for attiny85 ? And How can it jump over 4KB withRJMP
on attiny85?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there an example, that RJMP can exceeds 4094 bytes on attiny85, which is allowed by avr-ld ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like these were older comments?