Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[AArch64][PAC] Lower jump-tables using hardened pseudo. #97666
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[AArch64][PAC] Lower jump-tables using hardened pseudo. #97666
Changes from all commits
f2d13c9
a7e3602
55bd1cf
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: you probably want to create a helper lambda which will execute both
EmitToStreamer
and++InstsEmitted
- these are always used together inAArch64AsmPrinter::LowerHardenedBRJumpTable
. You can also use this lambda to get rid of*OutStreamer
in eachEmitToStreamer
invocation (just set this argument inside the lambda since it's always the same).Feel free to ignore.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, let's do that for the whole file someplace else
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't check against arm64e duplicating the check against function attribute? I'm not aware of full arm64e spec, but I suppose that frontend will set "jump-table-hardening" attribute when compiling for arm64e, so there is probably no need for this check here. The same applies to GlobalISel.
Feel free to ignore - I'm OK with such Apple-specific stuff if it's considered essential.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please explain what is MachO-specific here? It looks like that at least Linux+ELF could also we supported w/o changing code logic, just by deleting this assertion. ELF tests will require a slight change since assembly syntax and label names are a bit different, so I'm happy to add them by myself later if it's out of scope of the patch.
If there is definitely smth MachO-specific, shouldn't it also be checked in GlobalISel? Alternatively, the check can be moved to the pseudo expansion.