Skip to content

Removed $this->setShowGlobalIcon(); #19309

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

sreichel
Copy link
Contributor

@sreichel sreichel commented Nov 21, 2018

Description (*)

Is there any usage of $this->setShowGlobalIcon()?

I could not find any place where the vaule is used. In M1 there are some more files with this code, but it also seems unused.

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

  1. n/a

Manual testing scenarios (*)

  1. n/a

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds on Travis CI are green)

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sreichel. Thank you for your contribution
Here is some useful tips how you can test your changes using Magento test environment.
Add the comment under your pull request to deploy test or vanilla Magento instance:

  • @magento-engcom-team give me test instance - deploy test instance based on PR changes
  • @magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance - deploy vanilla Magento instance

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added this to the Release: 2.3.1 milestone Nov 21, 2018
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sivaschenko, thank you for the review.
ENGCOM-3512 has been created to process this Pull Request

@orlangur
Copy link
Contributor

@sreichel please consider removal of logic related to columnCountLayoutDepend also. Was never used in M2 but never removed as well.

@sivaschenko
Copy link
Member

@sreichel can you please remove the new commit and add it to a separate pull request as the first one is already in delivery stage

@sivaschenko
Copy link
Member

I don't think the pull request will be marked as merged if it will have extra commits, I think it's better to revert the branch to after the first commit and force push

@sreichel
Copy link
Contributor Author

sreichel commented Nov 22, 2018

@sivaschenko I tried to help but its starting to waste time. There are a lot of PRs with multiple commits - e.g. all with failed tests. And push force just to make it look clean?

@sreichel sreichel requested a review from orlangur November 22, 2018 19:46
@sidolov
Copy link
Contributor

sidolov commented Nov 22, 2018

Hi @sreichel , recently we delivered commit ba006c0 to the 2.3-develop branch, other two commits were skipped because you pushed them right before the merge. Looks like this commits are not related to current PR and should be removed. After the force push your PR will be merged and closed

@sreichel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sidolov

Looks like this commits are not related to current PR and should be removed.

Not related to the initial commit, but to orlangurs request .... thought i should add it here ...

@sreichel sreichel closed this Nov 22, 2018
@sreichel sreichel force-pushed the cleanup/unused-methods branch from 0a25aba to ba006c0 Compare November 22, 2018 20:55
@sreichel sreichel deleted the cleanup/unused-methods branch November 22, 2018 20:55
@sreichel sreichel restored the cleanup/unused-methods branch November 22, 2018 20:56
@sreichel sreichel deleted the cleanup/unused-methods branch November 22, 2018 20:56
@sreichel sreichel restored the cleanup/unused-methods branch November 22, 2018 21:00
@sreichel sreichel deleted the cleanup/unused-methods branch November 22, 2018 21:00
@sreichel sreichel restored the cleanup/unused-methods branch November 22, 2018 21:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants