-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
Refactor addlinks to own class take 3 (follows #21658) #23191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor addlinks to own class take 3 (follows #21658) #23191
Conversation
Hi @amenk. Thank you for your contribution
For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation |
@sivaschenko can you review this? Again, I don't understand the failed tests, as the reports do not show valuable info or are not available. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for updates @amenk , please see my review comments
Static tests build does not have a report indeed - relaunched it.
app/code/Magento/CatalogImportExport/Model/Import/Product/LinkProcessor.php
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/code/Magento/CatalogImportExport/Model/Import/Product/LinkProcessor.php
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...for code style problem existing before and add according FIXME
All checks are green.. |
I just want to get this through before the next merge conflict appears :)
|
@akaplya @sivaschenko I also want to understand which kind of negative effects that can be. |
@amenk the example of negative effect:
|
Thanks... But we have no other choice to add a new class, right?
|
bump @sivaschenko @akaplya Can this pleeeeeease be considered for merging? |
bump @sivaschenko @akaplya this has tag needs-update but I don't know which update you are expecting from me? Can this be progressed ? |
@sivaschenko By the way: The idea to extract it to a new class originally came from @orlangur in #21230 (comment) So I think it's the best way to proceed here. Or is there any other solution for the problem? |
@amenk you are right, idea with extraction is the best way here. Could you please cover changes with automated tests? |
@sidolov Thanks for your response. Actually I did mostly make no changes to functionality, just the extraction behind the scenes. |
I found a way by externalizing filtering ... |
Static Tests fail for B2B, not for CE .. how can I fix this locally for B2B ??? |
@sidolov @sivaschenko All tests are green. can this be merged now? |
Hi @ihor-sviziev, thank you for the review.
|
@ihor-sviziev Thanks a lot for reviewing & accepting. What are the next steps towards a merge? |
@amenk it will go through testing and merging flow. Hope it will be really fast |
@ihor-sviziev Okay, I think changes-requested by sivaschenko should be cleared, because I added the tests? All changes seem to be resolved. Shall I click "Dismiss review" ? |
@amenk no need, your PR already waiting to be tested |
✔️ QA Passed |
Hi @amenk, thank you for your contribution! |
Description
This is a follow up of #21658 - please refer to that one for more information.
It contains two steps
Contribution checklist (*)