Skip to content

test(NODE-6492): add integration tests for transaction write concern behavior #4490

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025

Conversation

nbbeeken
Copy link
Contributor

@nbbeeken nbbeeken commented Mar 26, 2025

Description

What is changing?

Add prose test - NODE-6492

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

No

What is the motivation for this change?

Spec compliance

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@nbbeeken nbbeeken requested a review from a team as a code owner March 26, 2025 15:34
@baileympearson baileympearson self-assigned this Mar 26, 2025
@baileympearson baileympearson added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Mar 26, 2025
@nbbeeken nbbeeken requested a review from baileympearson March 27, 2025 17:09
@nbbeeken nbbeeken requested a review from baileympearson March 31, 2025 16:37
@durran durran self-assigned this Apr 1, 2025
@nbbeeken nbbeeken force-pushed the NODE-6492-txn-prose branch from c6ad109 to bc8202b Compare April 2, 2025 15:22
@durran durran merged commit 9111f98 into main Apr 2, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@durran durran deleted the NODE-6492-txn-prose branch April 2, 2025 16:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants