rel: some housekeeping for 1.0

[mgxd]

Changes proposed in this pull request

• updated zenodo/mailmap
• add missing autotests from make specs

[effigies]

Looks good. We'll need a changelog update, but whether that's here or directly on master at release time is fine with me.

[satra]

yapf is not a runtime dependency. it has been added to a new label called specs below.

[mgxd]

ah didn't see this earlier - sorry for the clutter

[effigies]

We may be good to go. Do we need to do any documentation updates before release? We'll need to establish processes for contributing to 1.x-maint vs 2.0-dev (or whatever we call the branches).

[satra]

@effigies - till we get the engine in place (which should be highest priority for @djarecka in the next few weeks), we can go with current contribution process and do updates on the 1.x branch (leave master as is). as soon as the engine is ready and tested, we can create the 2.0 branch and start moving things over to the new engine.

[satra]

@effigies - the only other thing i would do is to check and update the tutorial. i know @djarecka now has automated testing of the tutorial. it should be checked against master perhaps before 1.0 is checked off.

[djarecka]

i can do it

[satra]

use current master (10.12pm eastern or later)

[djarecka]

unfortunately my tests are failing on graphs, it's likely not related to nipype itself, but I'll debug it tomorrow:
https://circleci.com/gh/djarecka/nipype_tutorial/34

[djarecka]

@satra @effigies were any changes to write_graph intended? Did we want to have a shorter name of files? After pep8 changes it's harder to use blame option in github...

write_graph is now inconsistent, if I call with graph2use='orig' I have workflow.dot.png, but if I use graph2use='colored' then I have file with a shorter name workflow.png.

[effigies]

#2381 was meant to remove the .dot. I'll have a look.

[effigies]

Good to merge and move tutorial discussion to #2397?