Replace flake8 and pyupgrade with ruff #754
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
twoertwein
commented
Jul 20, 2023
Dr-Irv
requested changes
Jul 20, 2023
|
@twoertwein So I thanked you for this, then forgot to merge, and now there is a conflict. Can you resolve that conflict and push again? |
…y special methods without return types
This reverts commit b3673c3.
|
Sorry, did |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pandas switched to ruff a while ago: ruff is much faster and combines many different tools (including flake8-pyi and pyupgrade).
ruff fails currently because of this line which looks a bit weird:
pandas-stubs/pandas-stubs/io/formats/style.pyi
Line 43 in 89e083b