incorrect docs: pd.NA ** 0 should return 1

[tsvikas]

pd.NA ** 0 returns 1. which is correct, as far as I understand ¹
However, the documents, line 832 incorrectly claims that pd.NA ** 0 returns 0.

---

¹ although one can ask if NULL**0 should behave like NAN**0

[MarcoGorelli]

Good catch :) Interested in opening a pull request?

[tsvikas]

let's try!

[tsvikas]

Sorry, it seems that I forked off the wrong branch somehow. I'll try again