RLS: 1.0.5

[simonjayhawkins]

xref #34664 (comment)

@simonjayhawkins do you have time one of those days to do a 1.0.5 release?

can do. do we want to include anything else, wait a few weeks before doing the release and see if anything else surfaces or just get a patch release done with the S3 changes?

I would personally just do a patch release with the S3 changes, and not wait a few weeks with that. But maybe open a RLS issue for it to get some feedback from others?

cc @pandas-dev/pandas-core

[jorisvandenbossche]

(note it's not only S3, but also from file-like objects -> #34626, #34467)

I would personally do a patch release (with the revert of the parquet changes) now, if possible, and not wait a few weeks more with that (it's already 2 weeks since 1.0.4 is out).

[TomAugspurger]

@simonjayhawkins are you able to manage the release again?

Might want to include #34667.

[samukweku]

Hi Team, great work. Pandas version on pip and condas show version 1.0.4, although details of Pandas 1.1.0 can be found on the website. Any date when Pandas 1.1.0 will be available for download?

[jorisvandenbossche]

although details of Pandas 1.1.0 can be found on the website.

Then you are looking at the dev docs, the stable docs show 1.0.4: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/

For 1.1, we're targetting end of June for a release candidate

[simonjayhawkins]

@simonjayhawkins are you able to manage the release again?

Might want to include #34667.

no problem. #34667 is tagged 1.0.5 so hopefully that'll auto backport.

[jorisvandenbossche]

@simonjayhawkins when would you have time to do the release?

IMO there is no point in waiting any longer. The release is already out for more than 2 weeks, and no other reports came in, while it's breaking a lot of people's parquet usage.

[simonjayhawkins]

IMO there is no point in waiting any longer.

should we at least backport tests for #34626, #34467 to be sure? do we have a test for #34626? #34500 has been merged so can break off the tests for #34467

[jorisvandenbossche]

Adding those tests to 1.0.x sounds good, yes

[simonjayhawkins]

OK. will get on and backport #34667 and the test from #34500 now so we can check ci on 1.0.x is green

also need to update the whatsnew, #34500 (comment)

[jorisvandenbossche]

also need to update the whatsnew, #34500 (comment)

I already did that: #34785

[simonjayhawkins]

I already did that: #34785

Thanks Joris

[simonjayhawkins]

just #34800 outstanding ( some doctest errors)

we didn't have the github actions running on previous release so this is probably not a blocker but some added confidence that the docs are building. so probably won't continue with the PR.

calling it a day. will pick up tomorrow (set date in whatsnew and tag)

lmk if anything else crops up. (set milestone or label as needs manual backport)

[simonjayhawkins]

have made progress on release scripts pandas-dev/pandas-release#32 today.

currently on doc build.

previous release was a mash-up of git bash, docker and Anaconda prompt.

with line endings, problems with sharing volumes in git bash, and having git in conda in git bash adding to the grief.

hopefully it'll be smoother this time, but using Windows on a low powered/low ram laptop with a slow metered mobile connection doesn't help.