PERF: 1.4.0rc1 Execution time of pd.read_sql increased from seconds to minutes

[SimoneD89]

Pandas version checks

• I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.

• I have confirmed this issue exists on the latest version of pandas.

• I have confirmed this issue exists on the master branch of pandas.

Reproducible Example

import urllib
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
import pandas as pd

driver = "{ODBC Driver 17 for SQL Server}"
url, database, uid, pwd = ...

params = urllib.parse.quote(
    "DRIVER=" + driver + ";"
    "SERVER=" + url + ";"
    "DATABASE=" + database + ";"
    "UID=" + uid + ";"
    "PWD=" + pwd
)

engine = create_engine(
    "mssql+pyodbc:///?odbc_connect=%s" % params
)

conn = engine.connect()

df = pd.read_sql("SELECT * FROM Table", conn)

After upgrading to 1.4.0rc, I noticed that the execution time of one of my script increased from a few seconds to 2-3 minutes. The performance regression comes from a simple pd.read_sql. Downgrading back to 1.3.5 the execution time is again of the order of seconds.

I'm sorry if I cannot provide more details, I'm not an expert in debugging at this level of expertise.

Installed Versions

INSTALLED VERSIONS

commit : d023ba7
python : 3.10.1.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Linux
OS-release : 5.15.12-200.fc35.x86_64
Version : #1 SMP Wed Dec 29 15:03:38 UTC 2021
machine : x86_64
processor : x86_64
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : it_IT.UTF-8
LOCALE : it_IT.UTF-8

pandas : 1.4.0rc0
numpy : 1.21.5
pytz : 2021.3
dateutil : 2.8.1
pip : 21.2.3
setuptools : 57.4.0
Cython : 0.29.24
pytest : 6.2.4
hypothesis : None
sphinx : 4.1.2
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : 3.0.2
lxml.etree : 4.6.3
html5lib : 1.1
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : 3.0.1
IPython : 7.26.0
pandas_datareader: 0.10.0
bs4 : 4.9.3
bottleneck : 1.3.2
fsspec : None
fastparquet : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : 3.5.1
numexpr : 2.7.1
odfpy : None
openpyxl : 3.0.3
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : None
pyxlsb : 1.0.9
s3fs : None
scipy : 1.7.3
sqlalchemy : 1.4.29
tables : 3.6.1
tabulate : None
xarray : None
xlrd : 2.0.1
xlwt : 1.3.0
numba : None
zstandard : None

Prior Performance

pandas : 1.3.5

[mroeschke]

Thanks for the report.

Unfortunately there's not much reproducibility that would help the triage team. It would help if the following information could be provided:

• Is this behavior similar in sqllite? Is there a small toy data example that the triage team could emulate locally?
• What was the prior timing performance in 1.3.5?

[SimoneD89]

Thank you for your reply. I knew that there was a problem of reproducibility and one of the reason is that I don't have full access to the database. I will try to reproduce a similar sqlite database tonight/tomorrow.

I can provide some more information:

• Timing (only pandas changes)
  pandas 1.3.5: 3.47 seconds
  pandas 1.4.0rc: 169.84 seconds
• I observed the performance issue only in this case (and not for other queries to other databases). Therefore it should be related to the specific database and connected to some change between 1.3.5 and 1.4.0rc

[jorisvandenbossche]

@SimoneD89 if providing a reproducible example is difficult in this case, you could maybe also try to profile it on your side and pass that information.

If you use IPython, you can use the %prun magic. If you could run %prun pd.read_sql("SELECT * FROM Table", conn) in both environments, and post the results here, that could already be useful to diagnose the problem.

https://github.com/jiffyclub/snakeviz provides a graphical way to present those results, and if you install that, you can replace %prun with %snakeviz in the above (after running %load_ext snakeviz).

If you don't use IPython, (I think) you can also achieve the same with cProfile.run("pd.read_sql('SELECT * FROM Table'"). Or put the full code snippet in a script. See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/582336/how-can-you-profile-a-python-script

[SimoneD89]

Thank you for your help in trying to debug the problem. I executed the magic %prun and below you have the results.

The executed command was
%prun pd.read_sql("SELECT TOP 100 * FROM Table", conn)

Results
pandas 1.4.0rc1: https://pastebin.com/8UR9cruc
pandas 1.3.5: https://pastebin.com/wwNqSt4b

[jorisvandenbossche]

Thanks! One more question (I should have thought to ask it directly): could you do the same but with %prun -D read_sql_pd14.prof pd.read_sql(..?
That will save a file to disk, which has more information (or more easily to interpret with other tools) than the text output (which is already kind of a summary), and if you could upload those files here, that would be great.

[jorisvandenbossche]

One thing that directly stands out is that in the pandas 1.4 version, the pyodbc.Cursor.execute method gets called > 1000 times, while in the pandas 1.3 version, it only gets called twice.
The engine.execute(..) in the actual pandas code only gets called once in both versions, though.

You are sure that eg the sqlalchemy version is the same in both cases?