VOTE: Voting Issue for PDEP-10: Add pyarrow as a required dependency

[Dr-Irv]

This is the issue where we will track votes for PDEP-10.

Pull request with discussion is here: #52711

Rendered PDEP for easy reading: https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/2db0037b10aaa14994b307cbe64ff82b7c1dc260/web/pandas/pdeps/0010-required-pyarrow-dependency.md

Cast your vote in a comment below.

• +1: approve.
• 0: abstain.
  • Reason: A one sentence reason is required.
• -1: disapprove
  • Reason: A one sentence reason is required.
    A disapprove vote requires prior participation in PDEP-10: Add pyarrow as a required dependency #52711 .

Voting will close in 15 days, i.e., on July 28.

@pandas-dev/pandas-core

[MarcoGorelli]

+1

(no reason necessary, but nonetheless: after recent discussions and clarifications, I'm sold. Mainly based on superseding object dtype in string, list, and struct dtypes, which would be a real and immediate benefit to users)

[phofl]

+1

[Dr-Irv]

+1

[rohanjain101]

+1

[MarcoGorelli]

Thanks for voting, but just as a reminder, this is meant to be limited to members of pandas-core. Not an issue, our fault for not having made this clearer 😄

Locking the conversation then, I think that then only core members will be able to comment

[jbrockmendel]

+1

[lithomas1]

+1

[bashtage]

+1

[mroeschke]

+1

[WillAyd]

+1

[lukemanley]

+1

[jreback]

+1