-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
DOC: fix the pandas.DataFrame.add example #20077
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jorisvandenbossche
merged 5 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
robinkiplangat:improved_docstring_for_pandas.DataFrame.rmul
Mar 15, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d58c4fe
fixed 'Wrong parameter order' validation error
robinkiplangat 736972d
added use of ‘…’ to pass doctests
robinkiplangat 2e36068
adjustment to indentation
robinkiplangat 5833bb6
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 4bic-improved_doc…
jorisvandenbossche ca3e5f9
fix alignment
jorisvandenbossche File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think
level : int or str
, though we're inconsistent here.@jorisvandenbossche what should our policy be on index positions or labels? In principle,
int or str
isn't quite right since index labels needn't be strings. It'd beint or object
, which isn't that informative.int or label
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, yes, this is a dubious one. "name" is technically not a 'type', but "str" would not be correct as you say. So maybe better to keep it that way.
If we keep the 'name' or 'label', wouldn't 'name' be better because it is here a index level name, not a label inside the index ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, yes you're right I was mistaken.
And we can declare that "name" means anything that can go in
{.index,.columns}{.name,.names}
.