Skip to content

Mention NaN handling in dtype description #20895

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 14, 2018
Merged

Mention NaN handling in dtype description #20895

Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
e89f065
Mention NaN handling in dtype description
jowagner May 1, 2018
cdcb54b
reduce detail in reference to NaN settings
jowagner May 1, 2018
e51aef7
mention NaN handling in dtype description
jowagner May 10, 2018
53dd911
Fix rst usage error in io.rst
jowagner May 14, 2018
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion pandas/io/parsers.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -125,7 +125,8 @@
are duplicate names in the columns.
dtype : Type name or dict of column -> type, default None
Data type for data or columns. E.g. {'a': np.float64, 'b': np.int32}
Use `str` or `object` to preserve and not interpret dtype.
Use `str` or `object` together with suitable `na_values` settings
to preserve and not interpret dtype.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add a newline below this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that a newline would be good here but this is orthogonal to the issue addressed in this PR. I'd think the newline should be added in a separate PR. Can anybody please provide a second opinion?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's minor enough that I wouldn't consider that an issue.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you add the same test in io.rst as well

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Of course. Done. (I previously assumed the doc is generated from .py.)

If converters are specified, they will be applied INSTEAD
of dtype conversion.
%s
Expand Down