-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
fixes qcut failing for labels = True #27033
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Dharni0607
commented
Jun 25, 2019
- closes qcut fails with labels=True #26963
@WillAyd, This is my first pull request, please review and let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thanks :-) |
Hi @Dharni0607 - thanks for the PR. The most critical part of any PR is a test case which ensures that the change is working as intended which we don't have here, so would be a good idea to start with that. You would want to give the contributing guide a read as it will give you good instructions on how to go about the process https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/development/contributing.html#contributing-to-pandas |
Thanks @WillAyd, I will refer it and add required tests. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #27033 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 91.99% 41.85% -50.15%
===========================================
Files 180 180
Lines 50774 50774
===========================================
- Hits 46711 21251 -25460
- Misses 4063 29523 +25460
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #27033 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.04% 92.03% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 180 180
Lines 50714 50714
==========================================
- Hits 46679 46675 -4
- Misses 4035 4039 +4
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Hello @Dharni0607! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found: There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻 Comment last updated at 2019-06-27 08:26:51 UTC |
I am not able to figure out why exactly the codecov has decreased. Can someone help, so that I can work on it. |
the coverage is not relevant it gives weird results. but more importantly, I think this needs discusion as this gives really weird semantics. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
needs discussion
Thanks for the PR @Dharni0607 . I think for now though this has gone stale and needs discussion anyway, so going to close to keep our PR queue clean. If interested in going further let's move discussion back to associated issue Thanks again! |