Inconsistent date parsing of to_datetime

doc/source/user_guide/timeseries.rst

@@ -204,16 +204,18 @@ If you use dates which start with the day first (i.e. European style),
 you can pass the ``dayfirst`` flag:
 
 .. ipython:: python
+   :okwarning:
 
     pd.to_datetime(["04-01-2012 10:00"], dayfirst=True)
 
     pd.to_datetime(["14-01-2012", "01-14-2012"], dayfirst=True)
 
 .. warning::
 
-   You see in the above example that ``dayfirst`` isn't strict, so if a date
+   You see in the above example that ``dayfirst`` isn't strict. If a date
    can't be parsed with the day being first it will be parsed as if
-   ``dayfirst`` were False.
+   ``dayfirst`` were False, and in the case of parsing delimited date strings
+   (e.g. ``31-12-2012``) then a warning will also be raised.
 
 If you pass a single string to ``to_datetime``, it returns a single ``Timestamp``.
 ``Timestamp`` can also accept string input, but it doesn't accept string parsing

doc/source/whatsnew/v1.4.0.rst

@@ -103,10 +103,20 @@ Notable bug fixes
 
 These are bug fixes that might have notable behavior changes.
 
-.. _whatsnew_140.notable_bug_fixes.notable_bug_fix1:
+.. _whatsnew_140.notable_bug_fixes.inconsistent_date_string_parsing:
 
-notable_bug_fix1
-^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+Inconsistent date string parsing
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+The ``dayfirst`` option of :func:`to_datetime` isn't strict, and this can lead to surprising behaviour:
+
+.. ipython:: python
+    :okwarning:
+
+    pd.to_datetime(["31-12-2021"], dayfirst=False)
+
+Now, a warning will be raised if a date string cannot be parsed accordance to the given ``dayfirst`` value when
+the value is a delimited date string (e.g. ``31-12-2012``).
 
 .. _whatsnew_140.notable_bug_fixes.notable_bug_fix2:
 
@@ -253,6 +263,7 @@ Categorical
 Datetimelike
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^
 - Bug in :class:`DataFrame` constructor unnecessarily copying non-datetimelike 2D object arrays (:issue:`39272`)
+- :func:`to_datetime` would silently swap ``MM/DD/YYYY`` and ``DD/MM/YYYY`` formats if the given ``dayfirst`` option could not be respected - now, a warning is raised in the case of delimited date strings (e.g. ``31-12-2012``) (:issue:`12585`)
 -
 
 Timedelta

pandas/_libs/tslibs/parsing.pyx

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ Parsing functions for datetime and datetime-like strings.
 """
 import re
 import time
+import warnings
 
 from libc.string cimport strchr
 
@@ -81,6 +82,11 @@ class DateParseError(ValueError):
 _DEFAULT_DATETIME = datetime(1, 1, 1).replace(hour=0, minute=0,
                                               second=0, microsecond=0)
 
+PARSING_WARNING_MSG = (
+    "Parsing '{date_string}' in {format} format. Provide format "
+    "or specify infer_datetime_format=True for consistent parsing."
+)
+
 cdef:
     set _not_datelike_strings = {'a', 'A', 'm', 'M', 'p', 'P', 't', 'T'}
 
@@ -168,10 +174,28 @@ cdef inline object _parse_delimited_date(str date_string, bint dayfirst):
         # date_string can't be converted to date, above format
         return None, None
 
+    swapped_day_and_month = False
     if 1 <= month <= MAX_DAYS_IN_MONTH and 1 <= day <= MAX_DAYS_IN_MONTH \
             and (month <= MAX_MONTH or day <= MAX_MONTH):
         if (month > MAX_MONTH or (day <= MAX_MONTH and dayfirst)) and can_swap:
             day, month = month, day
+            swapped_day_and_month = True
+        if dayfirst and not swapped_day_and_month:
+            warnings.warn(
+                PARSING_WARNING_MSG.format(
+                    date_string=date_string,
+                    format='MM/DD/YYYY'
+                ),
+                stacklevel=4,
+            )
+        elif not dayfirst and swapped_day_and_month:
+            warnings.warn(
+                PARSING_WARNING_MSG.format(
+                    date_string=date_string,
+                    format='DD/MM/YYYY'
+                ),
+                stacklevel=4,
+            )
         if PY_VERSION_HEX >= 0x03060100:
             # In Python <= 3.6.0 there is no range checking for invalid dates
             # in C api, thus we call faster C version for 3.6.1 or newer

pandas/core/tools/datetimes.py

@@ -701,8 +701,14 @@ def to_datetime(
         Specify a date parse order if `arg` is str or its list-likes.
         If True, parses dates with the day first, eg 10/11/12 is parsed as
         2012-11-10.
-        Warning: dayfirst=True is not strict, but will prefer to parse
-        with day first (this is a known bug, based on dateutil behavior).
+
+        .. warning::
+
+            dayfirst=True is not strict, but will prefer to parse
+            with day first. If a delimited date string cannot be parsed in
+            accordance with the given `dayfirst` option, e.g.
+            ``to_datetime(['31-12-2021'])``, then a warning will be shown.
+
     yearfirst : bool, default False
         Specify a date parse order if `arg` is str or its list-likes.
 
@@ -711,8 +717,11 @@ def to_datetime(
         - If both dayfirst and yearfirst are True, yearfirst is preceded (same
           as dateutil).
 
-        Warning: yearfirst=True is not strict, but will prefer to parse
-        with year first (this is a known bug, based on dateutil behavior).
+        .. warning::
+
+            yearfirst=True is not strict, but will prefer to parse
+            with year first.
+
     utc : bool, default None
         Return UTC DatetimeIndex if True (converting any tz-aware
         datetime.datetime objects as well).

pandas/tests/io/parser/test_parse_dates.py

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
     datetime,
 )
 from io import StringIO
+import warnings
 
 from dateutil.parser import parse as du_parse
 from hypothesis import (
@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@
 from pandas.core.indexes.datetimes import date_range
 
 import pandas.io.date_converters as conv
+from pandas.io.parsers import read_csv
 
 # constant
 _DEFAULT_DATETIME = datetime(1, 1, 1)
@@ -1556,16 +1558,16 @@ def test_invalid_parse_delimited_date(all_parsers, date_string):
     "date_string,dayfirst,expected",
     [
         # %d/%m/%Y; month > 12 thus replacement
-        ("13/02/2019", False, datetime(2019, 2, 13)),
         ("13/02/2019", True, datetime(2019, 2, 13)),
         # %m/%d/%Y; day > 12 thus there will be no replacement
         ("02/13/2019", False, datetime(2019, 2, 13)),
-        ("02/13/2019", True, datetime(2019, 2, 13)),
         # %d/%m/%Y; dayfirst==True thus replacement
         ("04/02/2019", True, datetime(2019, 2, 4)),
     ],
 )
-def test_parse_delimited_date_swap(all_parsers, date_string, dayfirst, expected):
+def test_parse_delimited_date_swap_no_warning(
+    all_parsers, date_string, dayfirst, expected
+):
     parser = all_parsers
     expected = DataFrame({0: [expected]}, dtype="datetime64[ns]")
     result = parser.read_csv(
@@ -1574,6 +1576,30 @@ def test_parse_delimited_date_swap(all_parsers, date_string, dayfirst, expected)
     tm.assert_frame_equal(result, expected)
 
 
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    "date_string,dayfirst,expected",
+    [
+        # %d/%m/%Y; month > 12 thus replacement
+        ("13/02/2019", False, datetime(2019, 2, 13)),
+        # %m/%d/%Y; day > 12 thus there will be no replacement
+        ("02/13/2019", True, datetime(2019, 2, 13)),
+    ],
+)
+def test_parse_delimited_date_swap_with_warning(
+    all_parsers, date_string, dayfirst, expected
+):
+    parser = all_parsers
+    expected = DataFrame({0: [expected]}, dtype="datetime64[ns]")
+    warning_msg = (
+        "Provide format or specify infer_datetime_format=True for consistent parsing"
+    )
+    with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg):
+        result = parser.read_csv(
+            StringIO(date_string), header=None, dayfirst=dayfirst, parse_dates=[0]
+        )
+    tm.assert_frame_equal(result, expected)
+
+
 def _helper_hypothesis_delimited_date(call, date_string, **kwargs):
     msg, result = None, None
     try:
@@ -1602,9 +1628,11 @@ def test_hypothesis_delimited_date(date_format, dayfirst, delimiter, test_dateti
     except_in_dateutil, except_out_dateutil = None, None
     date_string = test_datetime.strftime(date_format.replace(" ", delimiter))
 
-    except_out_dateutil, result = _helper_hypothesis_delimited_date(
-        parse_datetime_string, date_string, dayfirst=dayfirst
-    )
+    with warnings.catch_warnings():
+        warnings.filterwarnings("ignore", category=UserWarning)
+        except_out_dateutil, result = _helper_hypothesis_delimited_date(
+            parse_datetime_string, date_string, dayfirst=dayfirst
+        )
     except_in_dateutil, expected = _helper_hypothesis_delimited_date(
         du_parse,
         date_string,
@@ -1674,3 +1702,95 @@ def test_date_parser_usecols_thousands(all_parsers):
     )
     expected = DataFrame({"B": [3, 4], "C": [Timestamp("20-09-2001 01:00:00")] * 2})
     tm.assert_frame_equal(result, expected)
+
+
+def test_dayfirst_warnings():
+    # GH 12585
+    warning_msg_day_first = (
+        "Parsing '31/12/2014' in DD/MM/YYYY format. Provide "
+        "format or specify infer_datetime_format=True for consistent parsing."
+    )
+    warning_msg_month_first = (
+        "Parsing '03/30/2011' in MM/DD/YYYY format. Provide "
+        "format or specify infer_datetime_format=True for consistent parsing."
+    )
+
+    # CASE 1: valid input
+    input = "date\n31/12/2014\n10/03/2011"
+    expected_consistent = DatetimeIndex(
+        ["2014-12-31", "2011-03-10"], dtype="datetime64[ns]", freq=None, name="date"
+    )
+    expected_inconsistent = DatetimeIndex(
+        ["2014-12-31", "2011-10-03"], dtype="datetime64[ns]", freq=None, name="date"
+    )
+
+    # A. dayfirst arg correct, no warning
+    res1 = read_csv(
+        StringIO(input), parse_dates=["date"], dayfirst=True, index_col="date"
+    ).index
+    tm.assert_index_equal(expected_consistent, res1)
+
+    # B. dayfirst arg incorrect, warning + incorrect output
+    with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_day_first):
+        res2 = read_csv(
+            StringIO(input), parse_dates=["date"], dayfirst=False, index_col="date"
+        ).index
+    tm.assert_index_equal(expected_inconsistent, res2)
+
+    # C. dayfirst default arg, same as B
+    with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_day_first):
+        res3 = read_csv(
+            StringIO(input), parse_dates=["date"], dayfirst=False, index_col="date"
+        ).index
+    tm.assert_index_equal(expected_inconsistent, res3)
+
+    # D. infer_datetime_format=True overrides dayfirst default
+    # no warning + correct result
+    res4 = read_csv(
+        StringIO(input),
+        parse_dates=["date"],
+        infer_datetime_format=True,
+        index_col="date",
+    ).index
+    tm.assert_index_equal(expected_consistent, res4)
+
+    # CASE 2: invalid input
+    # cannot consistently process with single format
+    # warnings *always* raised
+
+    # first in DD/MM/YYYY, second in MM/DD/YYYY
+    input = "date\n31/12/2014\n03/30/2011"
+    expected = DatetimeIndex(
+        ["2014-12-31", "2011-03-30"], dtype="datetime64[ns]", freq=None, name="date"
+    )
+
+    # A. use dayfirst=True
+    with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_month_first):
+        res5 = read_csv(
+            StringIO(input), parse_dates=["date"], dayfirst=True, index_col="date"
+        ).index
+    tm.assert_index_equal(expected, res5)
+
+    # B. use dayfirst=False
+    with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_day_first):
+        res6 = read_csv(
+            StringIO(input), parse_dates=["date"], dayfirst=False, index_col="date"
+        ).index
+    tm.assert_index_equal(expected, res6)
+
+    # C. use dayfirst default arg, same as B
+    with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_day_first):
+        res7 = read_csv(
+            StringIO(input), parse_dates=["date"], dayfirst=False, index_col="date"
+        ).index
+    tm.assert_index_equal(expected, res7)
+
+    # D. use infer_datetime_format=True
+    with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_day_first):
+        res8 = read_csv(
+            StringIO(input),
+            parse_dates=["date"],
+            infer_datetime_format=True,
+            index_col="date",
+        ).index
+    tm.assert_index_equal(expected, res8)

pandas/tests/scalar/period/test_period.py

@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ def test_to_timestamp_tz_arg(self, tzstr):
 
         with tm.assert_produces_warning(FutureWarning):
             p = Period("1/1/2005", freq="A").to_timestamp(freq="A", tz=tzstr)
-        exp = Timestamp("31/12/2005", tz="UTC").tz_convert(tzstr)
+        exp = Timestamp(day=31, month=12, year=2005, tz="UTC").tz_convert(tzstr)
         exp_zone = pytz.timezone(tzstr).normalize(p)
 
         assert p == exp

pandas/tests/tools/test_to_datetime.py

@@ -1839,6 +1839,75 @@ def test_dayfirst(self, cache):
         tm.assert_index_equal(expected, idx5)
         tm.assert_index_equal(expected, idx6)
 
+    def test_dayfirst_warnings(self):
+        # GH 12585
+        warning_msg_day_first = (
+            "Parsing '31/12/2014' in DD/MM/YYYY format. Provide "
+            "format or specify infer_datetime_format=True for consistent parsing."
+        )
+        warning_msg_month_first = (
+            "Parsing '03/30/2011' in MM/DD/YYYY format. Provide "
+            "format or specify infer_datetime_format=True for consistent parsing."
+        )
+
+        # CASE 1: valid input
+        arr = ["31/12/2014", "10/03/2011"]
+        expected_consistent = DatetimeIndex(
+            ["2014-12-31", "2011-03-10"], dtype="datetime64[ns]", freq=None
+        )
+        expected_inconsistent = DatetimeIndex(
+            ["2014-12-31", "2011-10-03"], dtype="datetime64[ns]", freq=None
+        )
+
+        # A. dayfirst arg correct, no warning
+        res1 = to_datetime(arr, dayfirst=True)
+        tm.assert_index_equal(expected_consistent, res1)
+
+        # B. dayfirst arg incorrect, warning + incorrect output
+        with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_day_first):
+            res2 = to_datetime(arr, dayfirst=False)
+        tm.assert_index_equal(expected_inconsistent, res2)
+
+        # C. dayfirst default arg, same as B
+        with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_day_first):
+            res3 = to_datetime(arr, dayfirst=False)
+        tm.assert_index_equal(expected_inconsistent, res3)
+
+        # D. infer_datetime_format=True overrides dayfirst default
+        # no warning + correct result
+        res4 = to_datetime(arr, infer_datetime_format=True)
+        tm.assert_index_equal(expected_consistent, res4)
+
+        # CASE 2: invalid input
+        # cannot consistently process with single format
+        # warnings *always* raised
+
+        arr = ["31/12/2014", "03/30/2011"]
+        # first in DD/MM/YYYY, second in MM/DD/YYYY
+        expected = DatetimeIndex(
+            ["2014-12-31", "2011-03-30"], dtype="datetime64[ns]", freq=None
+        )
+
+        # A. use dayfirst=True
+        with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_month_first):
+            res5 = to_datetime(arr, dayfirst=True)
+        tm.assert_index_equal(expected, res5)
+
+        # B. use dayfirst=False
+        with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_day_first):
+            res6 = to_datetime(arr, dayfirst=False)
+        tm.assert_index_equal(expected, res6)
+
+        # C. use dayfirst default arg, same as B
+        with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_day_first):
+            res7 = to_datetime(arr, dayfirst=False)
+        tm.assert_index_equal(expected, res7)
+
+        # D. use infer_datetime_format=True
+        with tm.assert_produces_warning(UserWarning, match=warning_msg_day_first):
+            res8 = to_datetime(arr, infer_datetime_format=True)
+        tm.assert_index_equal(expected, res8)
+
     @pytest.mark.parametrize("klass", [DatetimeIndex, DatetimeArray])
     def test_to_datetime_dta_tz(self, klass):
         # GH#27733