Skip to content

DOC: Update meeseeksmachine reference #57107

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mroeschke
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mroeschke mroeschke added the Docs label Jan 27, 2024
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 3.0 milestone Jan 27, 2024
@mroeschke mroeschke requested a review from noatamir as a code owner January 27, 2024 22:20
@lithomas1
Copy link
Member

Wait, ... they changed it? 😱

I remember using @meeseeksdev still worked, at least a couple weeks back.

@mroeschke
Copy link
Member Author

Idk I tried using it in #57078 and wasn't getting a response from the old command. Also probably best to change this since meeseeksdev points to a user profile now

@datapythonista
Copy link
Member

@meeseeksdev hello

Copy link

lumberbot-app bot commented Jan 29, 2024

Helloooo @datapythonista, I'm Mr. Meeseeks! Look at me!

@datapythonista
Copy link
Member

I have the feeling that using @meeseeksdev is like when we use /preview, not really tagging that user, but just the keyword for the bot. I still see in all the docs that the right command is @meeseeksdev, and from the above test seems like it's still working. Happy to get this merged if I'm missing something, but in general I don't think this is needed.

@mroeschke
Copy link
Member Author

Ah OK maybe I was impatient with the response time of the bot so I'll close this PR

@mroeschke mroeschke closed this Jan 29, 2024
@mroeschke mroeschke deleted the doc/meeseekmachine branch January 29, 2024 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants