Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 4, 2020. It is now read-only.

Relax traversable constraint #77

Merged

Conversation

joneshf
Copy link
Contributor

@joneshf joneshf commented Dec 7, 2016

Sorry we had this erroneous constraint for the past two years. But, it's unnecessary.

Let me know if there's anything you'd like changed or anything else you'd like to see here.

The original implementation was based on code use external to this module.
Because of that, we had an additional constraint of `Ord k`—from `union`.
However, we know the implementation in this module.
So, we can use that knowledge to remove the `Ord k` constraint`.
@garyb
Copy link
Member

garyb commented Dec 7, 2016

Look like this should probably perform better too! 👍

@paf31
Copy link
Contributor

paf31 commented Dec 7, 2016

👍 Looks great!

@garyb garyb merged commit 338ccdb into purescript-deprecated:master Dec 7, 2016
@joneshf joneshf deleted the relax-traversable-constraint branch December 7, 2016 17:52
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants