Skip to content

Add x86InductorQuantizer Performance Number #2617

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

leslie-fang-intel
Copy link
Contributor

@leslie-fang-intel leslie-fang-intel commented Oct 24, 2023

Description

Add x86InductorQuantizer Performance Number.

Checklist

  • The issue that is being fixed is referred in the description (see above "Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER")
  • Only one issue is addressed in this pull request
  • Labels from the issue that this PR is fixing are added to this pull request
  • No unnecessary issues are included into this pull request.

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/tutorials/2617

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 6d1c9b7 with merge base feeca53 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@leslie-fang-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jerryzh168 please kindly help to take a look.

Copy link
Contributor

@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 requested a review from svekars October 24, 2023 02:16
@svekars svekars merged commit 623b93d into pytorch:main Oct 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants