Build static Linux arm64 binaries without docker #6928
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cknitt
force-pushed
the
setup-ocaml-arm64
branch
3 times, most recently
from
98d478e to
dc3b28d
Compare
cknitt
changed the title
cknitt
force-pushed
the
setup-ocaml-arm64
branch
from
dc3b28d to
6a8ef21
Compare
cknitt
force-pushed
the
setup-ocaml-arm64
branch
from
6a8ef21 to
eda5ac2
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use our own fork of opam-repository containing this fix:
ocaml/opam-repository#26323
This way, we do not need Docker anymore for the Linux arm64 build. So we can treat Linux arm64 exactly the same as the other architectures, get the benefit of the caching implemented by @cometkim, and do not need to create new Docker images for new OCaml versions anymore.