Skip to content

i686-musl: split timespec fields into (time_t, c_long) pairs #210

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 6, 2016
Merged

i686-musl: split timespec fields into (time_t, c_long) pairs #210

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 6, 2016

Conversation

japaric
Copy link
Member

@japaric japaric commented Mar 6, 2016

This is how MetadaExt expects these fields to be named.

See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/c116ae35cf49b55bd8d82e31f1ba030cf7e63867/src/libstd/os/linux/fs.rs#L107-L121


r? @alexcrichton
Alternatively, we could leave these fields as their are, and, instead, add some conditional logic (#[cfg]) to the MetadataExt implementation.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Would you be ok doing this for arm and asmjs at the same time as well?

@japaric
Copy link
Member Author

japaric commented Mar 6, 2016

Thanks! Would you be ok doing this for arm and asmjs at the same time as well?

Done

@alexcrichton alexcrichton merged commit 689fee5 into rust-lang:master Mar 6, 2016
danielverkamp pushed a commit to danielverkamp/libc that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
* [x86][avx2] add _mm256_shuffle{hi,lo}_epi16
* [x86][avx2] add _mm256_{insert,extract}i128_si256
* [x86][avx2] add remaining permute intrinsics
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants