Closed
Description
I think we should have a holistic conversation about what excludes should look like. The current syntax is currently quite baroque and AFAIK @pietroalbini's CI scripts are the only ones using most of the features. Slapping git-style ignores on top seems like it will make things more confusing, not less.
That said, I agree the behavior is confusing and there's room for improvement; I'd love to get rid of the doc::
prefixes somehow and make the various paths unambiguous.
See https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/excludes for the discussion; this issue is just a placeholder so it doesn't get lost.
Originally posted by @jyn514 in #102706 (review)