Skip to content

Potential typo in suggestion of E0689 #114683

Closed
@sunmy2019

Description

@sunmy2019

This line looks like a typo to me, should it be f64?

Originally posted by @sunmy2019 in #94963 (comment)

Currently, it affects line 1684.

|| found_assoc(tcx.types.i64)
|| found_assoc(tcx.types.i128)
|| found_assoc(tcx.types.u8)
|| found_assoc(tcx.types.u16)
|| found_assoc(tcx.types.u32)
|| found_assoc(tcx.types.u64)
|| found_assoc(tcx.types.u128)
|| found_assoc(tcx.types.f32)
|| found_assoc(tcx.types.f32);
if found_candidate
&& actual.is_numeric()

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

C-bugCategory: This is a bug.E-easyCall for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions