Skip to content

[discussion] ErrorKind::FilesystemQuotaExceeded from io_error_more #130190

Closed
@GrigorenkoPV

Description

@GrigorenkoPV

@rustbot label C-discussion

Main tracking issue: #86442

Background

The io_error_more feature introduced 21 new variants into ErrorKind. They were FCP'd back in December 2022, but there appeared to be quite a lot of disagreement about 4 of the added variants, so the stabilization (#106375) got stalled for over twenty months. Thankfully, the 17 uncontroversial variants got stabilized in #128316, so now we just need to iron out a satisfactory design for the remaining 4 variants, and then they can be stabilized too.

In order to not block any of the remaining variants on each other and to not intertwine the discussions, I've created 4 separate issues, which summarize the concerns & suggestions voiced up until this point and can serve as a place for further discussion.

FilesystemQuotaExceeded

Currently corresponds to EDQUOT on Unix and ERROR_DISK_QUOTA_EXCEEDED on Windows. (#86442 (comment)). As well as WSAEDQUOT on Windows (#130206).

Current docs description:

Filesystem quota was exceeded.

Drop "Filesystem" from the name

Can FilesystemQuotaExceeded be renamed QuotaExceeded? AFAIK Linux has no other quota error and EDQUOT is also used generically (not only for filesystem quotas). A few other uses are visible here: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.5/ident/EDQUOT. The comment in errno.h simply describes it as "Quota exceeded".

Originally posted by kalcutter in #86442 (comment)

With my libs-api hat on: 👍 for renaming FilesystemQuotaExceeded to QuotaExceeded, as OSes may use it for other kinds of quotas.

Originally posted by Josh Triplett in #106375 (comment)

I am not quite so sure about [keeping "Filesystem" in the name of] FilesystemQuotaExceeded but again I think APIs in std won't produce this error other than for filesystem operations.

Originally posted by Ian Jackson in #106375 (comment)

Seemingly a consensus.

Also map WSAEDQUOT on Windows

Done in #130206.

Old description

There is also the winsock error WSAEDQUOT. Shouldn't that be mapped [...] to QuotaExceeded?

Originally posted by kalcutter in #106375 (comment)

Yes, I think so. I'm not sure why we overlooked that. Generally I would expect that a WSAE error should be mapped the same way as the correspondingly named E error on Unix. I think I tired to do that. Are there other omissions?

Originally posted by Ian Jackson in #106375 (comment)

A consensus.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    C-discussionCategory: Discussion or questions that doesn't represent real issues.T-libs-apiRelevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.disposition-mergeThis issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it.finished-final-comment-periodThe final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions