Closed
Description
(Original title: More helpful error message for "missing 'self'")
The test for the improved error message was xfailed in SHA: 93d3b8a ; we want to un-xfail it.
Original bug report follows
Currently, if I write x
inside a class that has field x
, and x
isn't in the outer scope, the error I get is "unresolved name". I could see that being confusing. Ideally the typechecker would suggest "did you mean self.x
?" if self
has a field named x
.