Closed
Description
Tracking issue for rust-lang/rfcs#639.
Some things to nail down before stabilization:
- prototype implementation
- signature needs to have a
<T:Reflect>
bound - documentation should reflect the inherent instability in this value and describe valid uses
- perhaps signature should require input
T
to actually be anenum
instance? - do we want to adjust the return type in any way to enforce the above rules?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC and implemented but not stabilized.Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCMedium priorityRelevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised.