Closed
Description
Once #![feature(or_patterns)]
(#54883), i.e. pat_0 | ... | pat_n
in nested positions, e.g. Some(Ok(a) | Err(b))
have progressed sufficiently in their implementation, e.g. when the MIR building implementation is done, we should extend the test suite for #![feature(bindings_after_at)]
(#65490), e.g. b1 @ Some(b2)
, to exercise the combination of these two features. Ideally, we would also account for the combination of those two with #![feature(slice_patterns)]
(#62254) and #![feature(box_patterns)]
(#29641) as well to make things really air-tight.
This issue has been assigned to @thekuom via this comment.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustcCategory: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.Call for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate.`#![feature(bindings_after_at)]``#![feature(or_patterns)]``#![feature(slice_patterns)]`Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.