Loop constructs without parens

[brson]

Now that we have if and alts without parens I find myself wanting to write loops without them as well. Is this possible?

[marijnh]

the only tricky thing is that 'each' would no longer be a valid typename, I think

[graydon]

yeah. 'for' and 'for each' are, I hope, going to unify into 'for'-that-means-iterator-call. that is, we'll make for mean what for each means now, and remove the linear-for-loop specialization.

[marijnh]

This has been implemented as part of the recent syntax overhaul.