Skip to content

Rework Bounds collection #106235

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2023

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

I think it's weird for the Bounds struct in astconv to store its predicates almost converted into real predicates... so we do this eagerly, instead of lazily.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 28, 2022

r? @davidtwco

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 28, 2022
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Dec 28, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 28, 2022

⌛ Trying commit 8a8c8f233bb8fb76f1af8ecd99578afb3c773e6e with merge b91d9369c823d55819e539d191ee8a4af51d2fdf...

@compiler-errors compiler-errors force-pushed the rework-bounds-collection branch from 8a8c8f2 to 520b5fa Compare December 28, 2022 23:40
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 28, 2022

⌛ Trying commit 520b5fa with merge 299832898946e6df1f23e3811fba2c45d7086a84...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 29, 2022

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 299832898946e6df1f23e3811fba2c45d7086a84 (299832898946e6df1f23e3811fba2c45d7086a84)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (299832898946e6df1f23e3811fba2c45d7086a84): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.6% [-2.6%, -2.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.0% [-1.0%, -1.0%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.6% [-2.6%, -2.6%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Dec 29, 2022
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2023

📌 Commit 520b5fa has been approved by davidtwco

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 7, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 520b5fa with merge fa51fc0...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: davidtwco
Pushing fa51fc0 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 8, 2023
@bors bors merged commit fa51fc0 into rust-lang:master Jan 8, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Jan 8, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (fa51fc0): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.7% [-0.8%, -0.7%] 6
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the rework-bounds-collection branch August 11, 2023 20:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants