Make the inlining destination a Local.

[cjgillot]

Fixes #106141

[rustbot]

r? @davidtwco

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

[cjgillot]

@bors try @rustc-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 9c0a3c086dae00490fc39a5bce69a0f190e94eb4 with merge 6f50926c00ce6e9650037f77f052489c9492b727...

[cjgillot]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit de9a5b0 with merge 9ac434f7041fa6cb88dd7f5a7d6509a7bade0896...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 9ac434f7041fa6cb88dd7f5a7d6509a7bade0896 (9ac434f7041fa6cb88dd7f5a7d6509a7bade0896)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (9ac434f7041fa6cb88dd7f5a7d6509a7bade0896): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.9%	[4.9%, 4.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.9%	[-2.9%, -2.9%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

[oli-obk]

r? @oli-obk

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 389d52c has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 389d52c with merge af669c2...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing af669c2 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (af669c2): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.6%	[1.6%, 1.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.1%	[-3.4%, -2.9%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-3.1%	[-3.4%, -2.9%]	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (af669c2): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.6%	[1.6%, 1.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.1%	[-3.4%, -2.9%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-3.1%	[-3.4%, -2.9%]	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.