Skip to content

rustdoc: simplify some & ref erences #106907

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2023
Merged

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 15, 2023

r? @GuillaumeGomez

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 15, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 15, 2023

📌 Commit fdd6af1 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 15, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 16, 2023

⌛ Testing commit fdd6af1 with merge 41edaac...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 16, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 41edaac to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 16, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 41edaac into rust-lang:master Jan 16, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Jan 16, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (41edaac): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.7% [0.7%, 0.7%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.8% [-0.8%, -0.8%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.5% [-2.6%, -2.4%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rustdoc_ref branch January 25, 2025 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants