Add Nilstrieb to mailmap

[Noratrieb]

I saw that I'm on https://thanks.rust-lang.org/ twice (once as Nilstrieb and once as nils).

This is because I've contributed as both Nilstrieb (locally) and nils (on github). So I've mailmapped them both to Nilstrieb (the less ambiguous of the two).

I am not entirely sure whether I've done this correctly.

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[Mark-Simulacrum]

Not sure either, but generally seems fine.

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit fe42150 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit fe42150 with merge 63fdb82...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 63fdb82 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (63fdb82): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.9%	[0.8%, 1.1%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-0.7%, -0.6%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-0.7%, -0.2%]	14
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-0.7%, -0.6%]	4

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.7%	[2.7%, 2.7%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.7%	[2.7%, 2.7%]	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

[nnethercote]

Ugh, these perf changes are clearly noise.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged