return NoSolution for default assoc items

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt.rs

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::{
     self, OpaqueTypeKey, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeSuperVisitable, TypeVisitable,
     TypeVisitableExt, TypeVisitor,
 };
-use rustc_span::DUMMY_SP;
+use rustc_span::{ErrorGuaranteed, DUMMY_SP};
 use std::ops::ControlFlow;
 
 use crate::traits::specialization_graph;
@@ -561,6 +561,17 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
         }
     }
 
+    pub(super) fn term_error_of_kind(
+        &self,
+        kind: ty::Term<'tcx>,
+        guar: ErrorGuaranteed,
+    ) -> ty::Term<'tcx> {
+        match kind.unpack() {
+            ty::TermKind::Ty(_) => self.tcx().ty_error(guar).into(),
+            ty::TermKind::Const(ct) => self.tcx().const_error(ct.ty(), guar).into(),
+        }
+    }
+
     /// Is the projection predicate is of the form `exists<T> <Ty as Trait>::Assoc = T`.
     ///
     /// This is the case if the `term` is an inference variable in the innermost universe

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/project_goals.rs

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 use crate::traits::specialization_graph;
 
 use super::assembly::{self, structural_traits};
-use super::EvalCtxt;
+use super::{EvalCtxt, SolverMode};
 use rustc_errors::ErrorGuaranteed;
 use rustc_hir::def::DefKind;
 use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
@@ -167,17 +167,34 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for ProjectionPredicate<'tcx> {
                     .map(|pred| goal.with(tcx, pred));
                 ecx.add_goals(where_clause_bounds);
 
-                // In case the associated item is hidden due to specialization, we have to
-                // return ambiguity this would otherwise be incomplete, resulting in
-                // unsoundness during coherence (#105782).
-                let Some(assoc_def) = fetch_eligible_assoc_item_def(
+                let assoc_def = match fetch_eligible_assoc_item_def(
                     ecx,
                     goal.param_env,
                     goal_trait_ref,
                     goal.predicate.def_id(),
-                    impl_def_id
-                )? else {
-                    return ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS);
+                    impl_def_id,
+                ) {
+                    Ok(assoc_def) => assoc_def,
+                    Err(NotAvailableReason::ErrorGuaranteed(guar)) => {
+                        let error_term = ecx.term_error_of_kind(goal.predicate.term, guar);
+                        ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.term, error_term)
+                            .expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
+                        return ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes);
+                    }
+                    // In case the associated item is hidden due to specialization, we have to
+                    // return ambiguity during coherence as it would otherwise be incomplete,
+                    // resulting in unsoundness (#105782).
+                    //
+                    // Outside of coherence we want to fail here as we want to treat defaulted
+                    // associated items as opaque.
+                    Err(NotAvailableReason::DefaultItem) => match ecx.solver_mode() {
+                        SolverMode::Normal => return Err(NoSolution),
+                        SolverMode::Coherence => {
+                            return ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(
+                                Certainty::AMBIGUOUS,
+                            );
+                        }
+                    },
                 };
 
                 if !assoc_def.item.defaultness(tcx).has_value() {
@@ -574,6 +591,12 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for ProjectionPredicate<'tcx> {
     }
 }
 
+#[derive(Debug)]
+enum NotAvailableReason {
+    ErrorGuaranteed(ErrorGuaranteed),
+    DefaultItem,
+}
+
 /// This behavior is also implemented in `rustc_ty_utils` and in the old `project` code.
 ///
 /// FIXME: We should merge these 3 implementations as it's likely that they otherwise
@@ -585,26 +608,32 @@ fn fetch_eligible_assoc_item_def<'tcx>(
     goal_trait_ref: ty::TraitRef<'tcx>,
     trait_assoc_def_id: DefId,
     impl_def_id: DefId,
-) -> Result<Option<LeafDef>, NoSolution> {
+) -> Result<LeafDef, NotAvailableReason> {
     let node_item = specialization_graph::assoc_def(ecx.tcx(), impl_def_id, trait_assoc_def_id)
-        .map_err(|ErrorGuaranteed { .. }| NoSolution)?;
+        .map_err(NotAvailableReason::ErrorGuaranteed)?;
 
-    let eligible = if node_item.is_final() {
+    if node_item.is_final() {
         // Non-specializable items are always projectable.
-        true
+        Ok(node_item)
     } else {
         // Only reveal a specializable default if we're past type-checking
         // and the obligation is monomorphic, otherwise passes such as
         // transmute checking and polymorphic MIR optimizations could
         // get a result which isn't correct for all monomorphizations.
         if param_env.reveal() == Reveal::All {
             let poly_trait_ref = ecx.resolve_vars_if_possible(goal_trait_ref);
-            !poly_trait_ref.still_further_specializable()
+            if poly_trait_ref.still_further_specializable() {
+                // We'd have to deal with inference variables and return
+                // ambiguity or something, that's annoying so I am going to
+                // just ICE here until there's a need to actually implement
+                // this.
+                assert!(!poly_trait_ref.has_infer());
+                Err(NotAvailableReason::DefaultItem)
+            } else {
+                Ok(node_item)
+            }
         } else {
-            debug!(?node_item.item.def_id, "not eligible due to default");
-            false
+            Err(NotAvailableReason::DefaultItem)
         }
-    };
-
-    if eligible { Ok(Some(node_item)) } else { Ok(None) }
+    }
 }

tests/ui/traits/new-solver/specialization/specialization-default-no-solution.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// check-pass
+// compile-flags: -Ztrait-solver=next
+#![feature(specialization)]
+#![allow(incomplete_features)]
+trait Trait {
+    type Assoc;
+}
+
+impl<T> Trait for T {
+    default type Assoc = u32;
+}
+
+impl Trait for u32 {
+    type Assoc = u32;
+}
+
+fn generic<T: Trait<Assoc = u32>>(_: T) {}
+
+fn main() {
+    generic(1)
+    // We want `normalizes-to(<{integer} as Trait>::Assoc, u32)`
+    // to succeed as there is only one impl that can be used for
+    // this function to compile, even if the default impl would
+    // also satisfy this. This is different from coherence where
+    // doing so would be unsound.
+}

tests/ui/traits/new-solver/specialization-transmute.rs → tests/ui/traits/new-solver/specialization/specialization-transmute.rs

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ impl<T> Default for T {
 
    fn intu(&self) -> &Self::Id {
         self
-        //~^ ERROR cannot satisfy `T <: <T as Default>::Id`
+        //~^ ERROR mismatched types
    }
 }
 
@@ -25,6 +25,6 @@ fn transmute<T: Default<Id = U>, U: Copy>(t: T) -> U {
 use std::num::NonZeroU8;
 fn main() {
     let s = transmute::<u8, Option<NonZeroU8>>(0);
-    //~^ ERROR cannot satisfy `<u8 as Default>::Id == Option<NonZeroU8>
+    //~^ ERROR type mismatch resolving `<u8 as Default>::Id == Option<NonZeroU8>`
     assert_eq!(s, None);
 }

tests/ui/traits/new-solver/specialization-transmute.stderr → tests/ui/traits/new-solver/specialization/specialization-transmute.stderr

@@ -8,18 +8,30 @@ LL | #![feature(specialization)]
    = help: consider using `min_specialization` instead, which is more stable and complete
    = note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
 
-error[E0284]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `T <: <T as Default>::Id`
+error[E0308]: mismatched types
   --> $DIR/specialization-transmute.rs:16:9
    |
+LL |    fn intu(&self) -> &Self::Id {
+   |                      --------- expected `&<T as Default>::Id` because of return type
 LL |         self
-   |         ^^^^ cannot satisfy `T <: <T as Default>::Id`
+   |         ^^^^ types differ
+   |
+   = note: expected reference `&<T as Default>::Id`
+              found reference `&T`
 
-error[E0284]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `<u8 as Default>::Id == Option<NonZeroU8>`
-  --> $DIR/specialization-transmute.rs:27:13
+error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<u8 as Default>::Id == Option<NonZeroU8>`
+  --> $DIR/specialization-transmute.rs:27:48
    |
 LL |     let s = transmute::<u8, Option<NonZeroU8>>(0);
-   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot satisfy `<u8 as Default>::Id == Option<NonZeroU8>`
+   |             ---------------------------------- ^ type mismatch resolving `<u8 as Default>::Id == Option<NonZeroU8>`
+   |             |
+   |             required by a bound introduced by this call
+   |
+note: types differ
+  --> $DIR/specialization-transmute.rs:13:22
    |
+LL |    default type Id = T;
+   |                      ^
 note: required by a bound in `transmute`
   --> $DIR/specialization-transmute.rs:21:25
    |
@@ -28,4 +40,5 @@ LL | fn transmute<T: Default<Id = U>, U: Copy>(t: T) -> U {
 
 error: aborting due to 2 previous errors; 1 warning emitted
 
-For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0284`.
+Some errors have detailed explanations: E0271, E0308.
+For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0271`.

tests/ui/traits/new-solver/specialization-unconstrained.rs → tests/ui/traits/new-solver/specialization/specialization-unconstrained.rs

@@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ fn test<T: Default<Id = U>, U>() {}
 
 fn main() {
     test::<u32, ()>();
-    //~^ ERROR cannot satisfy `<u32 as Default>::Id == ()`
+    //~^ ERROR type mismatch resolving `<u32 as Default>::Id == ()`
 }

tests/ui/traits/new-solver/specialization-unconstrained.stderr → tests/ui/traits/new-solver/specialization/specialization-unconstrained.stderr

@@ -8,12 +8,17 @@ LL | #![feature(specialization)]
    = help: consider using `min_specialization` instead, which is more stable and complete
    = note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
 
-error[E0284]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `<u32 as Default>::Id == ()`
-  --> $DIR/specialization-unconstrained.rs:20:5
+error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<u32 as Default>::Id == ()`
+  --> $DIR/specialization-unconstrained.rs:20:12
    |
 LL |     test::<u32, ()>();
-   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot satisfy `<u32 as Default>::Id == ()`
+   |            ^^^ type mismatch resolving `<u32 as Default>::Id == ()`
    |
+note: types differ
+  --> $DIR/specialization-unconstrained.rs:14:22
+   |
+LL |    default type Id = T;
+   |                      ^
 note: required by a bound in `test`
   --> $DIR/specialization-unconstrained.rs:17:20
    |
@@ -22,4 +27,4 @@ LL | fn test<T: Default<Id = U>, U>() {}
 
 error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
 
-For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0284`.
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0271`.