Skip to content

fix spelling error #112315

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_driver/src/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
// This crate is intentionally empty and a rexport of `rustc_driver_impl` to allow the code in
// This crate is intentionally empty and a re-export of `rustc_driver_impl` to allow the code in
// `rustc_driver_impl` to be compiled in parallel with other crates.

pub use rustc_driver_impl::*;
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions src/librustdoc/visit_ast.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -147,9 +147,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> RustdocVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {

// `#[macro_export] macro_rules!` items are reexported at the top level of the
// crate, regardless of where they're defined. We want to document the
// top level rexport of the macro, not its original definition, since
// the rexport defines the path that a user will actually see. Accordingly,
// we add the rexport as an item here, and then skip over the original
// top level re-export of the macro, not its original definition, since
// the re-export defines the path that a user will actually see. Accordingly,
// we add the re-export as an item here, and then skip over the original
// definition in `visit_item()` below.
//
// We also skip `#[macro_export] macro_rules!` that have already been inserted,
Expand Down