Fixed typo in re-exports.md

[PhilVoel]

own't -> won't

[rustbot]

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @notriddle (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

• @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
• @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

[notriddle]

@bors r+ rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit 59ed84a has been approved by notriddle

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[notriddle]

Thanks a bunch!

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 59ed84a with merge 26970b8...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: notriddle
Pushing 26970b8 to master...

[bors]

👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 Update is not a fast forward

[Noratrieb]

@bors r=notriddle
thanks autocorrect

[bors]

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

• This pull request is currently being tested. If there's no response from the continuous integration service, you may use retry to trigger a build again.

[bors]

📌 Commit 59ed84a has been approved by notriddle

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 59ed84a with merge 01ce2d0...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: notriddle
Pushing 01ce2d0 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (01ce2d0): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.5%	[1.3%, 1.6%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 628.712s -> 629.364s (0.10%)
Artifact size: 317.95 MiB -> 317.94 MiB (-0.00%)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (26970b8): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.9%	[-0.9%, -0.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.1%	[-2.2%, -2.0%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.9%	[-0.9%, -0.9%]	1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.7%	[-1.7%, -1.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.7%	[-1.7%, -1.7%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 629.667s -> 629.02s (-0.10%)
Artifact size: 317.82 MiB -> 317.88 MiB (0.02%)