Skip to content

bump tracing-tree to 0.3 #123236

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2024
Merged

bump tracing-tree to 0.3 #123236

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2024

Conversation

klensy
Copy link
Contributor

@klensy klensy commented Mar 30, 2024

Only change in tracing-tree is davidbarsky/tracing-tree#76

  • dedupes tracing-log
  • dupes nu-ansi-term

Only change is davidbarsky/tracing-tree#76
dedupes tracing-log
dupes nu-ansi-term
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 30, 2024

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 30, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 30, 2024

Some changes occurred in exhaustiveness checking

cc @Nadrieril

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 30, 2024

📌 Commit 71ea506 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 30, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 31, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 71ea506 with merge c93b17d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 31, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing c93b17d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 31, 2024
@bors bors merged commit c93b17d into rust-lang:master Mar 31, 2024
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Mar 31, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (c93b17d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.9% [-3.9%, -3.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -3.9% [-3.9%, -3.9%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 668.042s -> 667.013s (-0.15%)
Artifact size: 315.71 MiB -> 315.73 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants