Skip to content

Bump to 1.82 #128007

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 21, 2024
Merged

Bump to 1.82 #128007

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 21, 2024

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 20, 2024
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 20, 2024

📌 Commit 9db2650 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 20, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2024
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#128007 - Mark-Simulacrum:bump-version, r=Mark…
f6d4098 
…-Simulacrum

Bump to 1.82

https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#bump-the-stable-version-number-t-6-days-friday-the-week-before

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 20, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 9db2650 with merge f6d4098...

@klensy
Copy link
Contributor

klensy commented Jul 20, 2024

Wait, there is error, why it merging?

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 20, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 20, 2024
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think bors cares about errors from PR CI, but it will probably fail there too. Weird error

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

Ah I commented half a second too late

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 20, 2024

rust-analyzer is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/rust-analyzer instead.

cc @rust-lang/rust-analyzer

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 20, 2024

📌 Commit 94a4279 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 20, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors p=20 (because of rollups and stuff(

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 20, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 94a4279 with merge c1a631d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 21, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing c1a631d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 21, 2024
@bors bors merged commit c1a631d into rust-lang:master Jul 21, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Jul 21, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (c1a631d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 769.446s -> 769.442s (-0.00%)
Artifact size: 328.90 MiB -> 328.83 MiB (-0.02%)

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum deleted the bump-version branch July 21, 2024 15:15
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Apr 29, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum

Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.82.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@Mark-Simulacrum @bors @rust-log-analyzer @klensy @tgross35 @rustbot @matthiaskrgr @rust-timer