Skip to content

make the const-unstable-in-stable error more clear #129818

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 31, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -415,8 +415,8 @@ const_eval_unstable_const_fn = `{$def_path}` is not yet stable as a const fn

const_eval_unstable_in_stable =
const-stable function cannot use `#[feature({$gate})]`
.unstable_sugg = if it is not part of the public API, make this function unstably const
.bypass_sugg = otherwise `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` can be used to bypass stability checks (but requires team approval)
.unstable_sugg = if the function is not (yet) meant to be stable, make this function unstably const
.bypass_sugg = otherwise, as a last resort `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` can be used to bypass stability checks (but requires team approval)

const_eval_unterminated_c_string =
reading a null-terminated string starting at {$pointer} with no null found before end of allocation
Expand Down
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions compiler/rustc_passes/src/stability.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -544,9 +544,8 @@ impl<'tcx> MissingStabilityAnnotations<'tcx> {
let is_stable =
self.tcx.lookup_stability(def_id).is_some_and(|stability| stability.level.is_stable());
let missing_const_stability_attribute = self.tcx.lookup_const_stability(def_id).is_none();
let is_reachable = self.effective_visibilities.is_reachable(def_id);

if is_const && is_stable && missing_const_stability_attribute && is_reachable {
if is_const && is_stable && missing_const_stability_attribute {
let descr = self.tcx.def_descr(def_id.to_def_id());
self.tcx.dcx().emit_err(errors::MissingConstStabAttr { span, descr });
}
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,12 +20,12 @@ error: const-stable function cannot use `#[feature(const_refs_to_cell)]`
LL | x.get();
| ^
|
help: if it is not part of the public API, make this function unstably const
help: if the function is not (yet) meant to be stable, make this function unstably const
|
LL + #[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "...", issue = "...")]
LL | const fn bar3() -> u32 {
|
help: otherwise `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` can be used to bypass stability checks (but requires team approval)
help: otherwise, as a last resort `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` can be used to bypass stability checks (but requires team approval)
|
LL + #[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable(const_refs_to_cell)]
LL | const fn bar3() -> u32 {
Expand Down
Loading