-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
do not implement Relate
for "boring" types
#132044
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
changes to the core type system |
and update some macros while we're at it
Relate
for Abi
and Safety
Relate
for "boring" types
Also removes `TypeError::ConstnessMismatch`. It is unused.
@bors r+ rollup=never |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (ffd978b): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -1.7%, secondary 2.7%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 782.378s -> 781.646s (-0.09%) |
and update some macros while we're at it. This means we don't have to implement
TypeVisitable
for them.r? @compiler-errors