Fix some typos

[fudancoder]

No description provided.

[rustbot]

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @BoxyUwU (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

• @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
• @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

[jieyouxu]

Thanks
r? jieyouxu @bors r+ rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit 2ba5888 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[jieyouxu]

@bors r-

[jieyouxu]

You'll need to add a // ignore-tidy-linelength for tests/ui/moves/suggest-borrow-for-generic-arg.rs then rebless the test.

@rustbot author

[lqd]

You'll need to add a // ignore-tidy-linelength

or simply reflow the comment

[fudancoder]

You'll need to add a // ignore-tidy-linelength

or simply reflow the comment

I checked Lint's error and it was caused by a single line length that was too long. Do you need me to wrap lines to shorten the length of a single line?

[lqd]

That’s correct

[fudancoder]

That’s correct

Thanks. Modified!

[jieyouxu]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit e97be25 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e97be25 with merge 32c8a9f...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jieyouxu
Pushing 32c8a9f to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (32c8a9f): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 3.3%, secondary -3.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.3%	[3.3%, 3.3%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.3%	[-4.3%, -2.3%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.3%	[3.3%, 3.3%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary 2.6%, secondary 6.2%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.6%	[2.6%, 2.6%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	6.2%	[6.1%, 6.3%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.6%	[2.6%, 2.6%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 762.247s -> 761.878s (-0.05%)
Artifact size: 330.67 MiB -> 330.65 MiB (-0.01%)