Skip to content

docs: fix typos #134891

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2024
Merged

docs: fix typos #134891

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2024

Conversation

dxsullivan
Copy link
Contributor

Fix typos in docs. Thank you.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 29, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @GuillaumeGomez (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 29, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 29, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support

cc @Noratrieb

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 29, 2024

📌 Commit 0ebdc0c has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 29, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 0ebdc0c with merge 5c0a6e6...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 29, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 5c0a6e6 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 29, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 5c0a6e6 into rust-lang:master Dec 29, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 29, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (5c0a6e6): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.0%, secondary -2.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.7% [1.7%, 1.7%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.7% [-3.7%, -3.7%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.0% [-2.0%, -2.0%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.0% [-3.7%, 1.7%] 2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 761.12s -> 761.047s (-0.01%)
Artifact size: 325.46 MiB -> 325.44 MiB (-0.01%)

@dxsullivan dxsullivan deleted the fix-typo branch December 30, 2024 01:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants