-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Fix error reporting for multibyte characters in byte string literal #139362
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
tapanprakasht
wants to merge
3
commits into
rust-lang:master
Choose a base branch
from
tapanprakasht:fix-byte-string-non-ascii
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -199,16 +199,7 @@ pub(crate) fn emit_unescape_error( | |
err.span_label(span, format!("must be ASCII{postfix}")); | ||
// Note: the \\xHH suggestions are not given for raw byte string | ||
// literals, because they are araw and so cannot use any escapes. | ||
if (c as u32) <= 0xFF && mode != Mode::RawByteStr { | ||
err.span_suggestion( | ||
span, | ||
format!( | ||
"if you meant to use the unicode code point for {c:?}, use a \\xHH escape" | ||
), | ||
format!("\\x{:X}", c as u32), | ||
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect, | ||
); | ||
} else if mode == Mode::Byte { | ||
if mode == Mode::Byte { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is it true that we can only reach this branch for multibyte characters? My limited knowledge of utf8 would suggest we do the obviously-correct thing: if mode != Mode::RawByteStr {
let mut utf8 = String::new();
utf8.push(c);
if mode == Mode::Byte && utf8.as_bytes().count() > 1 {
// error "this is multibyte"
} else {
// suggest \xHH
}
} |
||
err.span_label(span, "this multibyte character does not fit into a single byte"); | ||
} else if mode != Mode::RawByteStr { | ||
let mut utf8 = String::new(); | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there may also need to be consideration of the situation in the origin code, where it's possible that users may want to use single bytes, so we can explicitly state that the suggested value is a single byte value, not a UTF-8 encoding.
So, we could add this suggestion above
if mode == Mode::Byte {
such as below.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe that if a user explicitly specifies a character using a byte literal, their intention is likely to use the actual byte encoding. Otherwise, they would have directly provided the correct hex value.
Additionally, when dealing with a single byte value, it suggests a Unicode code point in hex even though that's not the full encoding, while for a multi-byte value, it throws a different error. That's more of an inconsistent behaviour.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know enough about typical uses of byte chars. We should at the very least explicitly mention that what we're suggesting is not an utf8 encoding? For reference, this behavior was introduced in #87659 to fix #87397.