Skip to content

Don't use 'synonym' with regards to newtypes #21040

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2015

Conversation

steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Fixes #20037.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2015
Don't use 'synonym' with regards to newtypes

Reviewed-by: alexcrichton
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2015
Don't use 'synonym' with regards to newtypes

Reviewed-by: alexcrichton
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2015
Don't use 'synonym' with regards to newtypes

Reviewed-by: alexcrichton
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2015
Don't use 'synonym' with regards to newtypes

Reviewed-by: alexcrichton
alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 16a8c4d into rust-lang:master Jan 16, 2015
@steveklabnik steveklabnik deleted the gh20037 branch October 25, 2017 18:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Guide: Confusing description for newtype idiom
5 participants