Fix examples that use missing_docs lint #31219
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The missing_docs lint only applies to public items in public modules, so this example code did not actually generate any warnings or errors.
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
@bors: r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit e23f8b0 has been approved by |
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2016
The missing_docs lint only applies to public items in public modules, so this example code did not actually generate any warnings or errors.
|
⌛ Testing commit e23f8b0 with merge fea215a... |
|
💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-opt |
|
@bors: retry On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:20 PM, bors [email protected] wrote:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The missing_docs lint only applies to public items in public modules, so this
example code did not actually generate any warnings or errors.