Skip to content

Use ? instead of try! macro in print::pprust #38692

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 1, 2017

Conversation

estebank
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @pnkfelix

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 1, 2017

📌 Commit 26f0181 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 1, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 26f0181 with merge a1f8ab4...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 1, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

alexcrichton commented Jan 1, 2017 via email

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 1, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 26f0181 with merge 4947ada...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2017
Use `?` instead of `try!` macro in `print::pprust`
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 1, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 4947ada to master...

@bors bors merged commit 26f0181 into rust-lang:master Jan 1, 2017
@estebank estebank deleted the remove-try-from-pprust branch November 9, 2023 05:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants