Skip to content

[beta] Update rls/cargo submodules #42525

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2017
Merged

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This updates the cargo submodule to the latest tip of Cargo, along with an
accompanying update to the rls submodule to keep it compiling.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

This is a backport of #42447

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

This updates the cargo submodule to the latest tip of Cargo, along with an
accompanying update to the `rls` submodule to keep it compiling.
@alexcrichton alexcrichton added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 8, 2017
@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Jun 8, 2017

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 8, 2017

📌 Commit 8128639 has been approved by brson

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 9, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 8128639 with merge bb92494...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2017
[beta] Update rls/cargo submodules

This updates the cargo submodule to the latest tip of Cargo, along with an
accompanying update to the `rls` submodule to keep it compiling.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 9, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: brson
Pushing bb92494 to beta...

@bors bors merged commit 8128639 into rust-lang:beta Jun 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants