Skip to content

Don't fail to build a manifest if a tarball is missing #45570

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2017

Conversation

nrc
Copy link
Member

@nrc nrc commented Oct 27, 2017

This is guesswork because I can't test build_manifest nor do I know what is actually causing the error to begin with. My hypothesis is that when we try to find the version from the RLS tarball and the tarball is not there, then we panic. I attempt to fix this by making the version string optional, then not adding the RLS package, rename, and extension component if the version is missing.

In theory, this should fix the broken nightlies.

r? @alexcrichton

@nrc nrc force-pushed the manifest-no-rls branch from 36f7882 to 9c87aca Compare October 27, 2017 06:07
@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 27, 2017
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ p=1

agreed on all counts! Including inability to test, the cause of the problem, and likelihood of this fixing it :)

Increasing the priority to hopefully fix nightlies.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 27, 2017

📌 Commit 9c87aca has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 27, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 9c87aca with merge bed9a85...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2017
Don't fail to build a manifest if a tarball is missing

This is guesswork because I can't test build_manifest nor do I know what is actually causing the error to begin with. My hypothesis is that when we try to find the version from the RLS tarball and the tarball is not there, then we panic. I attempt to fix this by making the version string optional, then not adding the RLS package, rename, and extension component if the version is missing.

In theory, this should fix the broken nightlies.

r? @alexcrichton
@kennytm kennytm added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 27, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 27, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing bed9a85 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 9c87aca into rust-lang:master Oct 27, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants