Skip to content

Report a targeted note for generic parameters that are missing a trait bound #46403

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2017

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Nov 30, 2017

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@@ -289,6 +289,11 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
// This has nothing here because it means we did string
// concatenation (e.g. "Hello " + "World!"). This means
// we don't want the note in the else clause to be emitted
} else if let ty::TyParam(_) = lhs_ty.sty {
// FIXME: point to span of param
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have not been able to figure out how to get the span of T in the generic argument list in order to create a suggestion. The FnCtxt doesn't seem to store the generics or the DefId or the BodyId of the function it's currently checking.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope. Presumably we could thread this information down.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK. I'll do that in a separate PR. This one already improves the message imo

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we're going to solve this though, I'd really like to find a way to remove the Name from the ty::ParamIdx -- which presumably would require storing the set of in-scope generics into TLS somewhere (though that would possibly only be used by the Debug and Display impls).

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Nov 30, 2017

r? @nikomatsakis

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned nikomatsakis and unassigned eddyb Nov 30, 2017
@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 30, 2017
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 4, 2017

📌 Commit 9e062c8 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 5, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 9e062c8 with merge 98a96b0...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2017
Report a targeted note for generic parameters that are missing a trait bound
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 5, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: nikomatsakis
Pushing 98a96b0 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 9e062c8 into rust-lang:master Dec 5, 2017
@oli-obk oli-obk deleted the generic_missing_impl branch December 5, 2017 14:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants