-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Suggest to use self for fake-self from other languages #54694
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ | ||
// Copyright 2018 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT | ||
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at | ||
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT. | ||
// | ||
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or | ||
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license | ||
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your | ||
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed | ||
// except according to those terms. | ||
|
||
struct Foo { | ||
x: i32, | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl Foo { | ||
fn this1(&self) -> i32 { | ||
let this = self; | ||
let a = 1; | ||
this.x | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn this2(&self) -> i32 { | ||
let a = Foo { | ||
x: 2 | ||
}; | ||
let this = a; | ||
this.x | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @estebank There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @estebank I guess it won't be hard as there alread has methods like check_field There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That's great! In that case, could you make a follow up PR incorporating that change? At that point, if the check fails it might need to be a There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yep, added an entry to TODO. |
||
} | ||
|
||
fn foo(&self) -> i32 { | ||
this.x | ||
//~^ ERROR cannot find value `this` in this scope | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn bar(&self) -> i32 { | ||
this.foo() | ||
//~^ ERROR cannot find value `this` in this scope | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn baz(&self) -> i32 { | ||
my.bar() | ||
//~^ ERROR cannot find value `my` in this scope | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn main() { | ||
let this = vec![1, 2, 3]; | ||
let my = vec![1, 2, 3]; | ||
let len = this.len(); | ||
let len = my.len(); | ||
} | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | ||
error[E0425]: cannot find value `this` in this scope | ||
--> $DIR/suggest-self.rs:31:9 | ||
| | ||
LL | this.x | ||
| ^^^^ | ||
| | | ||
| not found in this scope | ||
| help: did you mean: `self` | ||
|
||
error[E0425]: cannot find value `this` in this scope | ||
--> $DIR/suggest-self.rs:36:9 | ||
| | ||
LL | this.foo() | ||
| ^^^^ | ||
| | | ||
| not found in this scope | ||
| help: did you mean: `self` | ||
|
||
error[E0425]: cannot find value `my` in this scope | ||
--> $DIR/suggest-self.rs:41:9 | ||
| | ||
LL | my.bar() | ||
| ^^ | ||
| | | ||
| not found in this scope | ||
| help: did you mean: `self` | ||
|
||
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors | ||
|
||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we ever get here in case that
this
ormy
are defiend? If so, maybe we should add a check here to only suggest this when they are undefined and the author actually meant what we callself
?A test case to consider adding would be
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, it's covered. I tested this locally(but deleted this lines from test case):
it works fine and doesn't trigger the err.
I'll recover this as you point here.