Skip to content

Update an outdated comment in mir building #56127

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 29, 2018
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 2 additions & 3 deletions src/librustc_mir/build/expr/as_temp.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -85,9 +85,8 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {

unpack!(block = this.into(&Place::Local(temp), block, expr));

// In constants, temp_lifetime is None. We should not need to drop
// anything because no values with a destructor can be created in
// a constant at this time, even if the type may need dropping.
// In constants, temp_lifetime is None. We do not drop anything because
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not None except for the outermost scope. We need to keep all other drops in, to get errors about them (since they will execute in the future).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

// values with a destructor will simply be leaked in constants.
if let Some(temp_lifetime) = temp_lifetime {
this.schedule_drop_storage_and_value(
expr_span,
Expand Down